Legal Opinion

Griggs v. Bic Corp.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1992No. Civ. A. 1:CV-90-2125PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CALDWELL, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiffs, Timothy and Catherine Griggs (the Griggs), instituted this products liability action on behalf of their minor son, Zachary, for injuries sustained in a fire, allegedly started by a disposable butane lighter manufactured by defendant, BIC Corporation (BIC). Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. We will examine the motion under the well-settled standard. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986).

II. Background

On October 10, 1985, Kenneth Hemp-stead,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Burch v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Michael SURACE; Alice Surace, H/w, Appellants, v. CATERPILLAR, INC.; CMI Corporation, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Griggs v. BIC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Shouey Ex Rel. Litz v. Duck Head Apparel Co., Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Griggs v. Bic Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Mccarthy v. Olin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API