Legal Opinion

CITY NAT. BK. OF ANCHORAGE v. Molitor

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1964No. 36847PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

The point to this case involves changes effected in a written contract by parol evidence. Regrettably, we must take a long and tedious path to get to it.

Frank H. Molitor and Ralph E. Doremus carried on an accounting partnership in Anchorage, Alaska. Mr. Molitor became active in a corporation known as Anchorage Bus Company, organized, for the purpose of carrying passengers between military installations in the area and the city of Anchorage. In 1955, a rival bus company, Matanuska Valley Lines, challenged Anchorage Bus Company’s certificate of convenience and necessity and enjoined its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fleetham v. SchneeklothWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Mapes v. Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Nelson Equipment Co. v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. v. FoxWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. McDonald v. WyantWashington Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grant County Constructors v. E. v. Lane Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Lisi v. MarraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  3. Seattle-First National Bank v. PearsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Shelton v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Green River Valley Foundation, Inc. v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API