CITY NAT. BK. OF ANCHORAGE v. Molitor
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
The point to this case involves changes effected in a written contract by parol evidence. Regrettably, we must take a long and tedious path to get to it.
Frank H. Molitor and Ralph E. Doremus carried on an accounting partnership in Anchorage, Alaska. Mr. Molitor became active in a corporation known as Anchorage Bus Company, organized, for the purpose of carrying passengers between military installations in the area and the city of Anchorage. In 1955, a rival bus company, Matanuska Valley Lines, challenged Anchorage Bus Company’s certificate of convenience and necessity and enjoined its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fleetham v. SchneeklothWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Mapes v. Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
- Nelson Equipment Co. v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. v. FoxWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- McDonald v. WyantWashington Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grant County Constructors v. E. v. Lane Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Lisi v. MarraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
- Seattle-First National Bank v. PearsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Shelton v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Green River Valley Foundation, Inc. v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.