Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

General Motors Corporation (Employer) petitions for review of the April 9, 2003, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), which affirmed the decision of the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to grant Donald P. McHugh, Jr.’s (Claimant) claim petition for permanent disfigurement but modified the decision to increase the award of workers’ compensation benefits from fifteen weeks to fifty-five weeks. We affirm.

On January 21, 2000, Claimant sustained a work-related injury when he was struck in the face by a steel pipe. (WCJ’s Findings of Fact, No. 2; R.R. at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hastings Industries v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. DPW/Norristown State Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Dart Container Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API