Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 10, 1998PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

The City of Philadelphia (Employer) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB): (1) affirming, as modified, the workers’ compensation judge’s (WCJ) decision to award Andrew Do-herty (Claimant) workers’ compensation benefits for disfigurement; and (2) remanding to the WCJ to determine Claimant’s average weekly wage. 1

On November 22,1994, while in the course of his employment as a firefighter with Employer, Claimant sustained bums to his face after being splashed with battery acid. (WCJ’s Findings of Fact, No. 1.) Claimant incurred no loss of wages as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hastings Industries v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. City of Erie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Pesognelli Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Burke-Parsons Bowlby Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. LTV Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Craftsmen v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Penn Beverage Distributing Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Rebich)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. General Motors Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API