Legal Opinion

City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 2008No. 1701 C.D. 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

The City of Pittsburgh (Petitioner) petitions the Court for its review of the August 8, 2007 order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) increasing the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) award to James McFarren (McFar-ren) for his disfigurement pursuant to Section 806(c)(22) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act). 1 The question presented is whether the Board’s decision to increase McFarren’s disfigurement award from six weeks to thirty-five weeks is supported by substantial evidence and demonstrates an abuse of its discretion when the scar is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hastings Industries v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Lord & Taylor v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. General Motors Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Dart Container Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Keister Miller Invs. LLC v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. T. Allison v. WCAB (Fisher Auto Parts, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API