Massey v. Secretary of State
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
At the general election on November 3, 1992, the voters approved Proposal B. A part of that proposal, Const 1963, art 4, § 54, limits the number of terms persons may be elected to the office of state senator and the office of state representative. Plaintiffs filed this action, arguing that the submission of Proposal B to the voters was defective in two particulars. Plaintiffs sought an injunctive order preventing operation of art 4, § 54 for the general election of 1998 and thereafter. The circuit court granted summary disposition against plaintiffs, finding their claims without merit.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- School District v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Durant v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Jackson v. Com'r of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Miller v. BurkNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action & Integration, & Fight for Equity By Any Means Necessary v. Board of State Canvassers CitizensMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.