Legal Opinion

Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action & Integration, & Fight for Equity By Any Means Necessary v. Board of State Canvassers Citizens

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 2004No. Docket Nos. 254652, 254653PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FER CURIAM.

In these consolidated cases, defendant Board of State Canvassers appeals as of right from the opinion and order granting plaintiffs’ complaint for mandamus and ordering the board to rescind its approval of the form of a petition “to amend the constitution.”1 In both cases, plaintiffs have filed cross-appeals. In a previous order, this Court granted the proponent of the petition, Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (MCRI), leave to appear as amicus curiae. We reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand the matter to the board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

*398In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. School District v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Kuhn v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Bloomfield Charter Township v. Oakland County ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Department of Civil Rights Ex Rel. Forton v. Waterford Township Department of Parks & RecreationMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ferency v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action & Integration v. Bd. of State CanvassersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. the People Should Decide v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Michigan Civil Rights Initiative v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Stand up for Democracy v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Shaw v. Nanook, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API