Legal Opinion

Kruger v. California Highway Indemnity Exchange

California Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1927No. Docket No. S.F. 11518PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Action brought to recover upon a policy of insurance. The policy was issued by the appellant, the California Highway Indemnity Exchange, as insurer, to one John E. Delaney, the insured, referred to therein as the “subscriber.” It appears from the complaint that by an ordinance of the city and county of San Francisco known as the “Jitney Bus Ordinance” it was provided that it should be unlawful for any person to drive a “jitney bus” in said municipality without first procuring from the hoard of police commissioners a permit to operate the same, and, as a prerequisite to obtaining such permit,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re CardinalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Conner v. . ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Irwin v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Milliron v. DittmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Pioneer Savings & Loan Co. v. BartschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Belt Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Conold v. SternOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Bonfils v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Gabrelcik v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API