Legal Opinion

People v. Hoyt

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1942No. Crim. 4368PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

An indictment containing three counts jointly charged the defendants Barzen Hoyt, Delmar Arnold, James Lacey, Arthur Frazier and Sylvio Tosi with conspiracy to commit robbery, robbery, and murder. Each was also charged with a prior conviction of felony. Demurrers were interposed alleging that more than one offense was charged, that it did not appear that the offenses were connected in their commission, and that they were not offenses of the same class. Upon motion, the indictment was permitted to be amended on its face by adding to counts two and three, “and said acts and crimes…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. People v. KempleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. People v. ColtrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Hovey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API