Legal Opinion
Holtzman v. the World Book Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 13, 2001No. CIV.A. 00-3771PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
REED, Senior District Judge.
Now before, the Court is the motion of defendant World Book Company, Inc., for summary judgment. Upon consideration of the motion and the response of plaintiff Arlene Holtzman and the supporting briefs, as well as the documents and evidence submitted by the parties, I conclude as a matter of law that plaintiff was not an employee of World Book within the meaning of Title VII, and therefore cannot proceed with her claim under that statute. Accordingly, motion of defendant will be granted.
Background
Arlene Holtzman began working for World Book as a part-time…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brown v. J. Kaz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Matthew Faush v. Tuesday MorningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- United States ex rel. v. Watson v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Kahn v. American Heritage Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Faush v. Tuesday Morning, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.