Legal Opinion

Ohio Edison Co. v. Wartko Construction

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1995No. 94-P-0075PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nader, Judge.

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment entered in the Portage County Municipal Court, Kent Division.

Appellant, Ohio Edison Company, filed a complaint on October 12, 1993, seeking compensation for damage to electronic distribution equipment owned by appellant and alleged to have been negligently damaged during underground excavation activities conducted by appellee, Wartko Construction. The complaint set forth three counts relating to three separate excavations. Following a bench trial, the court entered judgment for appellee on the first two counts and for appellant on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gte North, Inc. v. CarrOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. United Telephone Co. v. C.J. Mahan Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Cincinnati Bell, Inc. v. CooperHamilton County Municipal Court · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Boyd v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Northeast Ohio Natural Gas Corp. v. Stout Excavating, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. MCI Worldcom Network Services, Inc. v. W.M. Brode Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  4. Ohio Gas Co. v. Blaze Bldg. Corp., Unpublished Decision (6-4-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Chang v. Time Warner CableOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API