Legal Opinion

United Telephone Co. v. C.J. Mahan Construction Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1989No. 88AP-823PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reilly, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court.

W.H. Blausey, Inc. (“Blausey”) submitted a bid to the Ohio Department of Transportation (“ODOT”) for improvements to U.S. Route 33 in Union City, Ohio. As part of this project, Blausey subcontracted with defendant, C.J. Mahan Construction Co., wherein Blausey would be responsible for moving the earth and paving. Defendant was accountable for constructing the bridges where Route 33 would either cross existing roads or existing roads would cross Route 33. The project plan advised bidders on the Route 33…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ohio Edison Co. v. Wartko ConstructionOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Boyd v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. MCI Worldcom Network Services, Inc. v. W.M. Brode Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  4. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. v. Columbus Asphalt Paving, Inc.Franklin County Municipal Court · 2006
  5. AT&T Corp v. J&J Schlaegel Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API