Legal Opinion

Chang v. Time Warner Cable

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 2019No. 19AP-101PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Chang v. Time Warner Cable,

2019-Ohio-3465.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Ching Chang, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 19AP-101 v. : (C.P.C. No. 17CV-5118) Time Warner Cable et al., : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendants-Appellees. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on August 27, 2019 On brief: Ching Chang, pro se. Argued: Ching Chang. On brief: E. Ray Critchett, LLC, and E. Ray Critchett, for appellees. Argued: E. Ray Critchett. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas BROWN, J. {¶ 1} Ching Chang, plaintiff-appellant, appeals from the judgment of the Franklin…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Sabouri v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Fuller v. MengelOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Grant Thornton v. Windsor House, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Zhelezny v. OleshOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rigo v. Liberty Mut. Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. State v. OberlyOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API