Price v. Crowl
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Stiftel, J.:
Defendants move for summary judgment on the deposition and affidavits of the Prices and the affidavits of architects Fridtjof Tobiessen and Daniel Moffler, contending that the injured plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. The facts upon which this motion is based are as follows:
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, visited the Fairville Hills Development, on the Kennett Pike, Pennsylvania, on Sunday, April 26, 1959, at approximately three o’clock in the afternoon, and decided to view the “Wedgewood” ranch sample home. Mr. Price opened the door of the sample home and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bloomer v. SnellenburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Stevenson v. Pennsylvania Sports & Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Cathcart v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Haugh v. Harris Bros. Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Kmiotek v. AnastSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Friday v. SmootSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Clayton v. BartoszewskiSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964