Legal Opinion

Cathcart v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1935No. Appeal, 268PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinión by

Rhodes, J.,

The defendant, in this action by the plaintiff to recover for personal injuries, appeals from the entry of judgment on a verdict-in favor of the plaintiff. The appellant contends: (1) That the plaintiff was c'ontributorily negligent as a matter of law; (2) that there was no evidence of negligence upon the part of the defendant.

On May 11, 1931, the plaintiff, a woman sixty-two years of age, in company with her son, her daughter-in-law, another young man, and her grandson went shopping in the defendant’s store, located on Roosevelt Boulevard, Philadelphia. They drove to the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pauckner v. WakemIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Starcher v. South Penn Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Kulka v. NemirovskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Robb v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Dively v. Penn-Pittsburgh Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Stevenson v. Pennsylvania Sports & Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Murphy v. Bernheim & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Murray v. Pittsburgh Athletic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API