Legal Opinion

Kmiotek v. Anast

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1944No. Appeal, 134PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Linn,

Defendants, who conduct a moving picture theater, appeal from judgment against them in a suit by a patron for personal injury and complain that they were not negligent, that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, and that the learned trial judge erred in his instructions to the jury.

April 10, 1940, the plaintiff and his wife occupied seats near the main aisle about ten rows from the rear. It was a small theater containing about 340 seats. After having been there for some time, and while “the picture was going on” he asked an usher where the toilet was. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Goodhart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. McCaffrey v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Dively v. Penn-Pittsburgh Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Haugh v. Harris Bros. Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Wilkinson v. North East BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Stark v. Lehigh Foundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Stevenson v. Pennsylvania Sports & Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Messer v. BeighleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. William J. Curnow, Administrator of the Estate of Martha M. McCoy Deceased v. West View Park CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  5. Wright v. EngleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API