Legal Opinion

Hirschfeld v. Machinist

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 24, 2018No. AC39772PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBright, J.

The plaintiff, Caroline Hirschfeld, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered on three postjudgment motions filed by the plaintiff in this dissolution action. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court erred by: (1) failing to find the defendant, Robert B. Machinist, in contempt for not complying with the property division terms of the separation agreement; (2) failing to find the defendant in contempt for underpaying alimony in the same year that their marriage had been dissolved; (3) determining that the parties' separation agreement was ambiguous and improperly considering…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Foley v. Huntington Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. McGuire v. McGuireConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Kronholm v. KronholmConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Tatro v. TatroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  5. Brett Stone Painting & Maintenance, LLC v. New England BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Konover v. KolakowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. United Cleaning & Restoration, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  3. Rader v. ValeriConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  4. Casablanca v. CasablancaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  5. Hirschfeld v. MachinistSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API