Legal Opinion

Mitz v. Stern

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1970No. Docket 7,147PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P. J.

This is a medical malpractice action brought by plaintiff, Harold Mitz, against defendant, Dr. Julian Stern. On November 21, 1968, a jury found in favor of plaintiff and awarded him $30,000 damages. Defendant’s motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or, in the alternative, for a new trial were denied. Defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of these motions.

Plaintiff was referred to defendant when he developed difficulty urinating. Defendant, a specialist in urology, informed plaintiff that surgery was required to correct this problem. After the trans-urethral resection…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lince v. MonsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Ruhala v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Skeffington v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Giacobazzi v. FetzerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Humenik v. SternbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Santiago Otero v. MéndezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
  3. Howard v. ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Patelczyk v. OlsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Burton v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API