Legal Opinion

Horman v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 11, 1987No. 860017-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARFF, Judge:

Defendants Rodney F. Gordon, Frank A. Nelson, and Jim P. Hansen appeal from the trial court’s entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff Sidney M. Horman, seeking an order adjusting the amount of the judgment entered against them jointly. Defendant Gordon also seeks a reversal of the judgment entered against him personally.

This appeal arises from a series of promissory notes executed by Gordon, Nelson, and Hansen in favor of Horman. Gordon, Nelson, and Hansen were principals in Eco-tek, a now defunct business consulting and management firm, and in Bonneville Development…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pink v. BuschNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  2. K-Line Builders v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Sims v. CraigNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Alaska Creamery Products, Inc. v. WellsAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Steel v. EagleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. James Constructors, Inc. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  2. Trugreen Companies, LLC v. Scotts Lawn ServiceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2007
  3. Bissonnette v. WylieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. Ward v. IHC HEALTH SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  5. Baer v. MyersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API