Bissonnette v. Wylie
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Plaintiffs Donald and Claudette Bissonnette appeal from a summary judgment order in favor of defendants Daniel Mendl and Martin Lavin, claiming the court erred in holding that comakers of a promissory note may be discharged under 9A V.S.A. § 3-606 when the creditor unjustifiably impairs the collateral. We hold that the § 3-606 defense is available to a comaker only if the comaker is in the position of a surety. Because we conclude that defendants Mendl and Lavin were sureties, both as to their comaker Nicholas Wylie and as to plaintiffs, we affirm the decision of the trial court discharging…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Crimmins v. LowryTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Burlington Electric Department v. Vermont Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Hemenway v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- State Bank of Hartland v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bissonnette v. WylieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- In Re: Charles Alcock Betty Alcock, Debtors. Charles Alcock Betty Alcock v. Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Bissonnette v. WylieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Federal Financial Co. v. LandersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- In Re Trust of Marsha Milot (Jennifer Milot, Appellant)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2026