Legal Opinion

Semple v. Eubanks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 8, 1896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. Edward Gray.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

— Two judgments were obtained against the Llano Improvement & Furnace Company, a corporation, one 'in favor of C. P. Eubanks, for $287.57, and one in favor of W. P. Darby and T. L. Cauthen, composing the firm of Darby & Cauthen, on November 3, 1891. The corporation immediately appealed, giving supersedeas bonds, and the judgments were affirmed on November 1, 1893. On November 25, 1891, after the supersedeas appeals were perfected, abstracts of the judgments were duly entered and indexed in Llano County, except that in the reverse index to the Darby & Cauthen judgment the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Texas Trunk Railway Co. v. Jackson Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Gruner v. WestinTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Woodson v. Collins & DouglasTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Leon H. Blum v. KeyserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. Smith v. KaleTexas Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McDonald v. AyresTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. McDonald v. AyresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. First National Bank v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Roman v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Dawkins v. Fenslage (In re Dawkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API