Legal Opinion

Roman v. Goldberg

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 17, 1928No. 673PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.

On May 30, 1927, appellees obtained a judgment in. the county court against appellant foi^OO, Jirom which he appealed, giving a supersedeas bond. On July 20, 1927, appellees obtained and had recorded an abstract of said judgment. On August 971927,* appellant placed in escrow $240 for said purpose and obtained from appellees a release of the judgmentJLien. Appellant filed this suit Tor damages which he claims to have suffered by reason of the abstract of judgment being recorded. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to appellant’s petition and dismissed the suit. The only question for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cooper v. YoakumTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Pope v. WedgeworthTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  3. Semple v. EubanksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. StappCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Williams v. Knight Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. Dawkins v. Fenslage (In re Dawkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API