Legal Opinion
Will v. Boler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 5, 1942No. 33,126PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
This was a suit to restrain defendants from damming and obstructing a ditch and to compel removal of obstructions placed therein by them. Plaintiff prevathed. Defendants’ alternative motion for amended findings or new trial being denied, they appeal.
The essential facts may be thus summarized: The lands involved lie in section 16 in Nashville township, Martin county. Plaintiff owns and occupies the NW¼ and as tenant uses and occupies the adjoining 80 to the east. Defendants own and occupy the SEi/4- Over a portion of the section there exists a natural swale or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sheehan v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Bush v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- City of St. Paul v. Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Munsch v. StelterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Skinner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Highview North Apartments v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Collins v. WicklandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Lhotka v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Myron D. Lhotka v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Shapiro, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.