Legal Opinion

Collins v. Wickland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 14, 1958No. 37,174PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from that part of an order denying a new trial, which order was made pursuant to defendant’s blended motion for amended findings and conclusions of law, or in the alternative for a new trial.

We are here concerned with the proper law applicable in an action brought by the plaintiff, as the owner of a city lot, against the defendant, as the owner of an adjoining lot, to recover damages caused by the flooding of plaintiff’s basement. The flooding was alleged to have resulted from defendant’s obstruction and inadequate diversion of a well-defined water channel extending…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Enderson v. KelehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. O'Brien v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  4. McClure v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  5. Jungblum v. Minneapolis, New Ulm & Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Flood LitigationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Sachs v. ChiatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Pell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Kallevig v. HolmgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Hunt v. Estate of HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API