Legal Opinion

Myron D. Lhotka v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 30, 1997No. 96-3299PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDBERG, Judge.

Appellants Myron Lhotka, Darlene Lhotka, and Elroy Hanson 3 (“Lhotkas”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, dismissing their state law tort claims of trespass and nuisance. The district court granted summary judgment because it determined (1) that the Lhotkas’ claims were time-barred under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b) (1988), and (2) that the Lhotkas’ claims failed to state a prima facie case of either trespass or nuisance under Minnesota state law.

Because we find that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Garvis v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Randall v. Village of ExcelsiorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Rodney Kiemele Lillian Kiemele v. Soo Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. Doris Slaaten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lhotka v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API