State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. Fulop
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
In these paternity cases, Adult and Family Services appeals the allowance of attorney fees to respondents. We reverse. Parkhurst v. Faessler, 62 Or App 539, 661 P2d 571 (1983); Diamond Claims & Inves., Inc. v. Grensky, 68 Or App 446, 681 P2d 802 (1984). The dissent acknowledges that respondents failed to comply with the specific requirement of ORCP 68C(2) but argues that we should disregard that failure, because there was no prejudice. The relevant language of ORCP 68C(2) provides:
“A party seeking attorney fees shall assert the right to recover such fees by alleging the facts, statute, or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Parkhurst v. FaesslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Diamond Claims & Inves., Inc. v. GrenskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Attaway, Inc. v. SafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State Department of Human Resources v. StrasserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. FulopOregon Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.