Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. Fulop

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1985No. TC D8204-68360 CA A31740 SC 531630 D8031-60009 CA A32166PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This is a filiation proceeding. After a three-day trial, the jury found that the defendant was not the father of the child. The trial court awarded the defendant attorney fees under ORS 109.155(4). 1

The plaintiff, State of Oregon ex rel Adult and Family Services Division, appealed to the Court of Appeals assigning as the sole error that the trial court was wrong in awarding the defendant attorney fees “where his pleading asserted neither the facts, statute nor rule that provides a basis for the award.”

The plaintiff relies on ORCP 68C.(2):

“A party seeking attorney fees shall assert the right…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. FulopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Attaway, Inc. v. SafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. State Department of Human Resources v. StrasserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Attaway, Inc. v. SafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State Department of Human Resources v. StrasserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API