Legal Opinion
Eisley v. Mohan
California Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1948No. S. F. 17534Published
1Opinion of the Court
31 Cal.2d 637 (1948)
CHARLES H. EISLEY et al., Petitioners,
v.
LOU P. MOHAN, as County Assessor, etc., Respondent.
S. F. No. 17534.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Apr. 3, 1948.
John A. Sinclair and Warren H. Atherton for Petitioners.
J. R. Klawans and Orville Pratt, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.
Fred N. Howser, Attorney General, James E. Sabine, E. G. Benard, Deputy Attorneys General, Clarence E. Tindall, District Attorney (Placer County), and Frederick L. Felton, County Counsel (San Joaquin County), for Respondent.
EDMONDS, J.
Charles H. Eisley and the Department of Veterans Affairs…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Dows v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- United States v. RickertSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.