Legal Opinion

Beatty v. Esposito

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 9, 1977No. 75 C 1828PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PLATT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Vander L. Beatty and Samuel D. Wright, moved this Court on June 10, 1977 for an order granting leave to serve and file a proposed amended complaint and convening a three judge constitutional court, and for a temporary injunction enjoining the defendants from continuing alleged practices as described below.

The facts of the instant controversy are summarized at pages 2-4 of this Court’s previous Memorandum of March 25, 1976. In essence, plaintiffs have alleged in their original complaint and in their proposed amended complaint that defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. David Siegel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  3. Webber v. WhiteDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1976
  4. John F. Gangemi v. Salvatore Sclafani, Etc., and Angelo J. Arculeo, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. Beatty v. EspositoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. DanielsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  2. Eccles v. GargiuloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
  3. Beatty v. DinkinsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  4. Barnett v. BaileyDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API