Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Bailey

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided December 14, 1990No. 88-53-ATH(DF)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FITZPATRICK, District Judge.

This case is presently before the court on a motion for attorney’s fees made by the plaintiffs. The underlying suit claimed that Hart County, Georgia, officials failed to preclear an election plan with the United States Department of Justice as required by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973c. The plaintiffs’ complaint also alleged that members of the Democratic Party and Hart County government conspired to manipulate slates of candidates for the County’s old and new forms of government so that only those whom they supported would be elected, but…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. South Carolina v. KatzenbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Hampton County Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Powell v. PowerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. Beatty v. DinkinsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barnett v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Barnett v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API