Legal Opinion
Beatty v. Esposito
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 26, 1976No. 75C 1828PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
PLATT, District Judge.
Defendants have moved to dismiss this action on the ground that this Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter thereof because:
“a) it appears on the face of the complaint that the alleged claim does not arise under Title 42, Sections 1971, 1973(c) and 1973(k) of the United States Code;
“b) the complaint, fails to show the existence of an actual justiciable controversy or to raise a substantial federal question of the nature required by Article III of the United States Constitution;
“c) the allegations in the complaint fall within the exclusive primary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. Malcolm Wilson, Governor of the State of New York, N.A.A.C.P., Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lehner v. O'ROURKEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Sheehan v. McMahonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hathorn v. LovornSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ortiz v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Beatty v. EspositoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Hathorn v. LovornSupreme Court of the United States · 1982