Kerry v. Pacific Marine Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City -and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a mew trial. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Action on a charter-party by which defendant undertook to carry for plaintiff,.in the bark “Templar,” a cargo of piles from Seattle to San Francisco. Damages are -claimed as resulting from the careless and negligent handling of the piles while being loaded and unloaded, whereby the bark on them became peeled off, thus diminishing their value. Plaintiff had judgment for two thousand three hundred and ninety dollars, from which and from the order denying a new trial defendant appeals. The pleadings are verified.
The complaint alleges that defendant is a corporation, and *566“as managing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marcardier v. Chesapeake InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
- Hobson v. HassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Barrere v. SompsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Frankhouser v. CannonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Winter v. FulstoneNevada Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Durbin v. HillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Standard Livestock Co. v. PentzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Smith v. Royal Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Meisner v. McIntoshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Frost v. MighettoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.