Frankhouser v. Cannon
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Osage District Cowrt. The opinion states the facts. Judgment for plaintiff, Cannon, February 18, 1889. The defendant Franhhouser, as sheriff, and another, bring the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
*622The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This was an action brought by W. B. Cannon against N. Frankhouser and J. G. Ellis, to recover .the possession of two mares alleged to have been taken on execution as the property of his son, John P. Cannon. The mares were valued at $150, and $50 damages were claimed for the detention thereof. Trial before the court with a jury. A verdict was returned for the plaintiff below for the possession of the property, and $75 were allowed as damages for the detention of the same. Subsequently judgment was rendered thereon, and the defendants below…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCracken v. ToddSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862
- Loper v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
3Cited by11 opinions
- Monroe v. DarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Pfannenstiel v. DoerflerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Kerry v. Pacific Marine Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Osenbaugh v. Virgin & Morse Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Conner v. JanesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.