Legal Opinion
Smith v. Pasqualetto
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 27, 1956No. Civ. A. 54-502PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, District Judge.
This is an action for personal injuries. Following a verdict for the plaintiff the defendant, whose motion for a directed verdict on the ground of the statute of limitations was denied at the close of the evidence, moved for judgment n. o. v. The action was commenced in this court June 21,1954. The plaintiff is a resident of Massachusetts; the defendant of Illinois. Service of process was made upon the Registrar of Motor Vehicles pursuant to Mass.G.L.(Ter. Ed.) Ch. 90, § 3C. The defendant answered and alleged, among other things, that the cause of action did not accrue…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Breen v. BurnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Reed, Admr. v. RosenfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947
- Price v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hammel v. BettisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- I v. Services of America, Inc. v. Inn Development & Management, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Toczko v. ArmentanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Walsh v. OgorzalekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Newburgh v. FLORSHEIM SHOE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.