Legal Opinion
Nowlon v. Koram Insurance Center, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 18, 1991No. B049035PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoren, J.
The trial court sustained demurrers to Harold Nowlon’s first amended complaint without leave to amend. We conclude that Nowlon should be permitted to amend the complaint and reverse.
Facts
Nowlon alleges that he was injured when he slipped and fell at his place of employment. He theorizes that his fall was caused by the negligent acts of Western Building Cleaning Company (Western), which is not a party to this action.
Western had a general liability insurance policy issued by Mutual Fire Marine and Inland Insurance Company, located in Pennsylvania (Mutual). Mutual, which is also not a party to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Clinkscales v. CarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Munoz v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Johnson v. Holmes Tuttle Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Huang v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Reyes v. KoshaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- McKelvey v. Boeing North American, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Desai v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Hayter Trucking, Inc. v. Shell Western E & P, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Vikco Insurance Services, Inc. v. Ohio Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.