Legal Opinion
Aikens v. Ingram
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided December 4, 2014No. 5:11-CV-371-BOPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on defendants’ motion for summáry judgment, to which the plaintiff has responded in opposition. [DE 53, 60]. A hearing was held before the undersigned on November 10, 2014, in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, and the matter is ripe for ruling. For the reasons discussed below, defendants’ motion is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff originally filed this action alleging a civil rights claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a state law tort claim for invasion of privacy. Plaintiff clarified in his motion to dismiss that he has not…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frederick Aikens v. William Ingram, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Allen v. CooperDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2024
- Frederick Aikens v. William Ingram, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Frederick Aikens v. William Ingram, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Frederick Aikens v. William Ingram, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.