Legal Opinion

Frederick Aikens v. William Ingram, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 29, 2016No. 14-2419PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge THACKER wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING joined. Judge SHEDD wrote a separate concurring opinion.

THACKER, Circuit Judge:

Colonel Frederick Aikens (“Appellant”) challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim in favor of two former members of the North Carolina Army National Guard, Adjutant General William E. Ingram (“Ingram”) and Lieutenant Colonel Peter von Jess (“von Jess”) (collectively, “Appellees”). Appellant alleges that Ap-pellees, motivated by revenge, directed other service members to monitor…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Department of the Navy v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bae Sys. Tech. Solution & Servs., Inc. v. Republic of Korea's Def. Acquisition Program Admin.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. Carol Clendening v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  3. Roe v. ShanahanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
  4. Colon v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  5. Frankel v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API