Legal Opinion
Horattas v. Citigroup Financial Markets Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided September 12, 2007No. 1:07-cr-00122PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
PAUL L. MALONEY, District Judge.
Dismissing the Complaint With Prejudice Denying as Moot Zausmer’s Motion to Intervene in Place of the Named Plaintiffs Terminating Case
This putative class action was removed from state court. It comes before the court on defendant Citigroup Financial Market, Inc. d/b/a Smith Barney Citigroup (“Citigroup”)’s motion to dismiss. In addition, non-party Zausmer, the conservator of the cemeteries and management companies at issue, has filed a motion to intervene and a motion to dismiss the named plaintiffs as parties. The parties disagree over…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Whittiker v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Embassy Realty Investment, LLC v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
- Pension Committee of University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Power Up Lending Group, LTD. v. Cardinal Energy Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2022