Legal Opinion
State v. Huggins
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided September 17, 1982No. 6535, 6595PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SINGLETON, Judge.
Kenneth E. Huggins and Terrence Connors were charged as a result of separate and unrelated incidents with driving while intoxicated. During their respective trials the state sought to introduce a group of documents that the parties refer to collectively as the “breathalyzer packet,” as a foundation for the admission of the results of breathalyzer examinations administered to Huggins and Connor. 1 See AS 28.35.-033(d).
During the state’s case-in-chief District Court Judge Stephen R. Cline upheld Connors’ objection to the admissibility of the breathalyzer packet into…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kirby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Municipality of Anchorage v. SerranoCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. RuizNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Pears v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- State v. IrvingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- State v. MaureNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.