Legal Opinion
State v. Maure
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 17, 1990PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
240 N.J. Super. 269 (1990)
573 A.2d 186
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
DAVID MAURE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
RAYMOND HOBBS, HAROLD PETTY AND DANIEL HOBART, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 21, 1990.
Decided April 17, 1990.
Before Judges KING, SHEBELL and BAIME.
Stephen H. Monson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney).
Riaz Mian argued the cause for respondent (Voorhees, Bennett & Wherry, attorneys; Riaz Mian on the brief).
Larry E.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Romano v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- State v. WalstadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. GartheSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Bullet Hole, Inc. v. DunbarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- State v. GodshalkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- People v. UruburuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- State v. MaureSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.