Legal Opinion

GameStop, Inc. v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided August 22, 2018No. E068701PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRamirez, P. J.

Following an investigation into violations of the Secondhand Dealers Law (SDL), the People, by and through the District Attorneys of Riverside and Shasta Counties, filed an action pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq., (Unfair Competition Law or UCL) to enjoin petitioner GameStop, Inc., (GameStop) against noncompliance. GameStop filed a motion to remove the action from the County of Riverside pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 394, claiming that the district attorney, as an official elected by the County of Riverside, was a local governmental entity. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Singh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Arwine v. Board of Med. ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. People v. HailCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. City of San Diego v. Experian Data Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  2. People v. Super. Ct. (Credit One Bank)California Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API