Legal Opinion

Fawcett v. Department of Labor & Industry

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1937No. Calendar 39,578PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiffs sought a delayed appeal from an order of the department of labor and industry, awarding compensation under facts hereinafter stated. No opposition was made thereto and, after due consideration, we treated plaintiffs’ application as a petition for a writ of mandamus and issued an order to show cause. The subsequent answer of the department admits that its order, dated May 26, 1936, was mistakenly entered in the belief that a certain settlement agreement, previously filed, had not been approved and says that, after the entering of the order, it was discovered that the department was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Township of La Grange v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Tawas & Bay County Railroad v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. County of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Kirchner v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Wilcox v. Clarage Foundry & Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chittenden v. JarvisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lenz v. Mayor of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. McLean v. Eaton Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Fawcett v. AthertonMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Sweet v. Eddy Paper Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API