Kraxberger v. Chevron USA, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant (Chevron), claiming that it had committed an unfair employment practice when it refused to reemploy her in a position that was available and suitable. ORS 659.420. Chevron moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs claim was time-barred under ORS 659.121(3). The court granted the motion. Plaintiff appeals, and we affirm.
Plaintiff worked for Chevron in its warehouse. In February, 1987, she injured her shoulder while lifting a case of antifreeze. She received medical treatment and missed a few days of work, but then returned to her former duties.
Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Uihlein v. Albertson's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Dobie v. Liberty Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Williams v. Waterway Terminals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Lane County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- Huff v. Great Western Seed Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Huff v. Great Western Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Vélez Rodríguez v. Pueblo International, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994