Legal Opinion

Kraxberger v. Chevron USA, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1993No. 9007-04241; CA A70608PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant (Chevron), claiming that it had committed an unfair employment practice when it refused to reemploy her in a position that was available and suitable. ORS 659.420. Chevron moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs claim was time-barred under ORS 659.121(3). The court granted the motion. Plaintiff appeals, and we affirm.

Plaintiff worked for Chevron in its warehouse. In February, 1987, she injured her shoulder while lifting a case of antifreeze. She received medical treatment and missed a few days of work, but then returned to her former duties.

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Uihlein v. Albertson's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Dobie v. Liberty Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Williams v. Waterway Terminals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Lane County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huff v. Great Western Seed Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Huff v. Great Western Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Vélez Rodríguez v. Pueblo International, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API