Legal Opinion

Ward v. City of Alliance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1988No. 85-906PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment in favor of the City of Alliance in his action under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act. That judgment was based on the running of the statute of limitations.

In July of 1981, the plaintiff was an employee of the city of Mitchell. It had purchased part of an electrical substation, including a transformer, from the City of Alliance. As part of his duties for the city of Mitchell, the plaintiff dismantled this equipment in preparation for its move to Mitchell and in September began assisting in reconstructing this same equipment after it arrived…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Glynn Richard Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Spath v. MorrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Dawson v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hutmacher v. City of MeadNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Thomas v. Countryside of Hastings, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Susman v. Kearney Towing & Repair Ctr.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Hickman v. HunkinsNebraska Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Staman v. Yeager & Yeager, P.A.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API