Legal Opinion

Hutmacher v. City of Mead

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1988No. 87-065PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

In this action brought pursuant to the provisions of the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 23-2401 et seq. (Reissue 1983 & Cum. Supp. 1986), now Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 13-901 et seq. (Reissue 1987), the plaintiffs-appellants, Douglas Hutmacher and his wife, Barbara Hutmacher, claim to have suffered damages caused by defendant-appellee, City of Mead. The city moved for summary judgment on the grounds (1) that the Hutmachers allege the damages resulted from a misrepresentation for which the city is exempted from liability and (2) that, in any event, the cause is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Grand Island School District 2 v. Celotex Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Spath v. MorrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Rosnick v. MarksNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Georgetowne Ltd. Partnership v. Geotechnical Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Condon v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ruwe v. Farmers Mutual United Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. McCurry v. School District of ValleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Shlien v. Board of Regents of the University of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Polinski v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Renner v. WurdemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API