Hutmacher v. City of Mead
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.
In this action brought pursuant to the provisions of the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 23-2401 et seq. (Reissue 1983 & Cum. Supp. 1986), now Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 13-901 et seq. (Reissue 1987), the plaintiffs-appellants, Douglas Hutmacher and his wife, Barbara Hutmacher, claim to have suffered damages caused by defendant-appellee, City of Mead. The city moved for summary judgment on the grounds (1) that the Hutmachers allege the damages resulted from a misrepresentation for which the city is exempted from liability and (2) that, in any event, the cause is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Grand Island School District 2 v. Celotex Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1979
- Spath v. MorrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
- Rosnick v. MarksNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Georgetowne Ltd. Partnership v. Geotechnical Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Condon v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ruwe v. Farmers Mutual United Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- McCurry v. School District of ValleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Shlien v. Board of Regents of the University of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Polinski v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Renner v. WurdemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.