Dawson v. Eli Lilly and Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
Defendants Eli Lilly and Company, Abbott Laboratories, E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., and Upjohn Company have moved for summary judgment and to dismiss the complaint on the basis of the statute of limitations. The undisputed facts are as follows. In 1973, when plaintiff was seventeen years old, her mother read an article in the newspaper about diethylstilbestrol (DES) and its effects on the daughters of women who took the drug during pregnancy. She then ascertained from her obstetrician that she had taken DES during her pregnancy with the plaintiff. That same…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Nolan v. Johns-Manville AsbestosIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Hatsumi Yoshizaki v. Hilo HospitalHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Bowen v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Maughan v. SW Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.