Legal Opinion

Hickman v. Hunkins

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1992No. A-89-1153PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wright, Judge.

This action was commenced by the plaintiffs, Max D. Hickman, Miriam J. Hickman, and M. Douglas Hickman (Hickmans), against the defendant Ivan Hunkins; the defendant Town of Comstock, also known as Comstock Township, Ivan Hunkins, Chairman (Township); and the defendant Middle Loup Irrigation District. Apparently, at some point not evident from the record, the irrigation district was dismissed as a party to the action.

Hickmans alleged that on or about May 3, 1983, Hunkins breached a dike, causing surface water to drain upon Hickmans’ property, and that Hunkins placed a 12-inch…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Todd v. York CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Nichol v. YocumNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Nebraska Builders Products Co. v. Industrial Erectors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Morrissey v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Farmers Union Co-operative InsuranceNebraska Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Bailey v. FARMERS UNION CO-OP. INS.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API