Legal Opinion

Clark v. Shaw

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 10, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

This action was brought by three persons joining as parties plaintiff. General Statutes § 7824. Each sought to recover for injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant Walter A. Shaw in operating a motor vehicle owned by his mother, the defendant Hattie M. Shaw. The jury returned three verdicts, one for each of the plaintiffs. A motion “to set aside the verdict” was granted. Since the trial court and the plaintiffs have treated it as a motion to set the verdicts aside as to the defendant Hattie M. Shaw, we deal with it as such. The plaintiffs appealed and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Witchekowski v. Falls Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Greco v. KeenanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Doherty v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  4. Dorfman v. Martin Crawford Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Ferris v. Hotel Pick Arms, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  4. Tisdale v. Riverside Cemetery Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Emerick v. Monaco & Sons Motor Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API