Legal Opinion

People v. Luros

California Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1971No. Crim. 13153PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Stanley Fleishman and Gerald J. Levie for Defendants and Respondents.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

Defendants, Milton Luros, Reuben Sturman, World Wide News and London Press, Inc., were indicted in June 1966 by the Grand Jury of Los Angeles County for conspiring to violate section 311.2 of the Penal Code1 by wilfully preparing, publishing, printing and distributing four obscene books.2 Defendants moved, pursuant to section 995, to have the indictment set aside. The trial court first denied the motion, but, after reconsideration, reversed its decision and set aside the indictment on the ground that the prosecution had failed to introduce any competent evidence of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Aday v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People Ex Rel. Busch v. Projection Room TheaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bloom v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. People v. SarnbladCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API