Jetsuite, Inc. v. Cnty. of L. A.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtHoffstadt, J.
*14Due process prohibits a state from imposing a tax on the full value of personal property if other states also have the right to tax that property, and whether those states have that right turns on whether that property has "situs" in those other states. ( Central R. Co. v. Pennsylvania (1962) 370 U.S. 607, 611-614, 82 S.Ct. 1297, 8 L.Ed.2d 720 ( Central ); Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles (1958) 51 Cal.2d 314, 318, 333 P.2d 323 ( Flying Tiger ).) The taxing authority in this case sought to impose property tax on the full value of six jets used to operate an on-demand "air…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Armco Inc. v. HardestySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Air 7, LLC v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Rivera v. BroomfieldDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023